> 14 авг. 2019 г., в 14:12, Vladimir Davydov написал(а): > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 02:55:54PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: >> --- >> src/lua/pickle.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/lua/pickle.c b/src/lua/pickle.c >> index e47ac11b4..65208b5b3 100644 >> --- a/src/lua/pickle.c >> +++ b/src/lua/pickle.c >> @@ -109,14 +109,14 @@ lbox_pack(struct lua_State *L) >> case 'I': >> case 'i': >> /* signed and unsigned 32-bit integers */ >> - if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.ival != MP_INT) >> + if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.type != MP_INT) >> luaL_error(L, "pickle.pack: expected 32-bit int"); >> >> luaL_region_dup(L, buf, &field.ival, sizeof(uint32_t)); >> break; >> case 'N': >> /* signed and unsigned 32-bit big endian integers */ >> - if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.ival != MP_INT) >> + if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.type != MP_INT) >> luaL_error(L, "pickle.pack: expected 32-bit int"); >> >> field.ival = htonl(field.ival); > > I assume this is a bug and so this patch should be pushed to all > maintained branches, right? Yep > > Could you please add a test for this issue? No problem -- Serge Petrenko sergepetrenko@tarantool.org