Hi!

Thanks for the update. 
I was bad in my ASCII art. The change I expected was

> +-- Memprof is implemented for x86 and x64 architectures only.

LGTM
Sergos


> On 4 Jun 2021, at 16:37, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> 
> On 02.06.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Thanks for the patch!
>> Just one fixup is needed.
>> 
>> Sergos
>> 
>>> On 24 May 2021, at 16:27, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Memprof's tests fail for architectures different from x86 and x64,
>>> because memprof is not yet implemented for them.
>>> 
>>> This patch adds skip condition to corresponding test.
>>> ---
>>> test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
>>> index b4d66509..4df9cfd8 100644
>>> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
>>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
>>> +-- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures.
>>                             ^^^^ ——>                          ^
>>> +require("utils").skipcond(
>>> +  jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64",
>> 
>> I believe you overcomplicated the condition so it’ll skip even for
>> mentioned archs
>> 
>> tarantool> x='x86'
>> ---
>> ...
>> 
>> tarantool> x~='x86' or x~='x64'
>> ---
>> - true
>> ...
>> 
> 
> Thanks, nice catch!
> 
> Fixed.
> Branch is force-pushed.
> 
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> index 4df9cfd8..96beb680 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> --- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures.
> +-- Memprof is implemented for only x86 and x64 architectures.
> require("utils").skipcond(
> -  jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64",
> +  jit.arch ~= "x86" and jit.arch ~= "x64",
>   jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof"
> )
> 
> @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ local free = fill_ev_type(events, symbols, "free")
> -- the number of allocations.
> -- 1 event - alocation of table by itself + 1 allocation
> -- of array part as far it is bigger than LJ_MAX_COLOSIZE (16).
> -test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 21, 19, 2))
> +test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 27, 25, 2))
> -- 100 strings allocations.
> -test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 26, 19, 100))
> +test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 32, 25, 100))
> 
> -- Collect all previous allocated objects.
> test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102)
> @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102)
> -- Tests for leak-only option.
> -- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5812 <https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5812>.
> local heap_delta = process.form_heap_delta(events, symbols)
> -local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(21)]
> -local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(26)]
> +local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(27)]
> +local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(32)]
> test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.nalloc == tab_alloc_stats.nfree)
> test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.dbytes == 0)
> test:ok(str_alloc_stats.nalloc == str_alloc_stats.nfree)
> ===================================================================
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +  jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof"
>>> +)
>>> +
>>> local tap = require("tap")
>>> 
>>> local test = tap.test("misc-memprof-lapi")
>>> -- 
>>> 2.31.0
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Sergey Kaplun