From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id EE5592C0C1 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:13:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5nxxtrLO6WkN for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:13:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpng1.m.smailru.net (smtpng1.m.smailru.net [94.100.181.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id A98AC26797 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:13:17 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] schema: add new system space for CHECK constraints References: <0cd8bbf7-adfa-f59e-b726-313700aa2b39@tarantool.org> <417a7e5d-d590-a9f1-9e4c-5490180c8689@tarantool.org> <3BCC24C4-8859-496A-B960-D15895D94B89@tarantool.org> <14d4a03f-8db6-539e-2ce7-c58a5c392fa0@tarantool.org> <13FA07C4-DD2A-4A56-B460-5EC2DDF95464@tarantool.org> From: Vladislav Shpilevoy Message-ID: <88c6d110-c967-f555-caa1-7efe2d5f0a42@tarantool.org> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:13:14 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <13FA07C4-DD2A-4A56-B460-5EC2DDF95464@tarantool.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, "n.pettik" Cc: Kirill Shcherbatov Yes, I will. Kirill, please, send it again in a new thread. You can keep version 3 and omit change list. On 13/05/2019 15:29, n.pettik wrote: > >> On 13 May 2019, at 10:11, Kirill Shcherbatov wrote: >> >> Ok, thank you. Now it is clear. > > I can say that now this particular patch LGTM. Since it is huge > enough, I guess smb should briefly revise it as well. Vlad, could > you take a quick look at it? >