From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp36.i.mail.ru (smtp36.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7954E469719 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 20:32:03 +0300 (MSK) From: Vladislav Shpilevoy References: <3d2907a0285c640ea09eec86c8922e43c5844953.1584198310.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> <20200314163432.GW27301@uranus> <5b4578df-aab3-968b-f9bd-a00b60bd6591@tarantool.org> Message-ID: <86521117-2757-a564-a9ab-5c36041dca40@tarantool.org> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:32:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5b4578df-aab3-968b-f9bd-a00b60bd6591@tarantool.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/1] fiber: extend max fiber name length to 255 List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Besides, most of the users don't use long names. So for them it would be overkill to allocate such a big name memory for each fiber.