From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpng2.m.smailru.net (smtpng2.m.smailru.net [94.100.179.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463E5469719 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 01:39:15 +0300 (MSK) References: <07914e287ba121ab735959bcf3bfd6794c591359.1604166646.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> <20201102121506.GB2339@grain> From: Vladislav Shpilevoy Message-ID: <8299e23f-0a5d-914f-b64a-0b7998f1f813@tarantool.org> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 23:39:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201102121506.GB2339@grain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] txn: split complete into success and fail paths List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Hi! Thanks for the review! On 02.11.2020 13:15, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:01:41PM +0100, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote: >> txn_complete used to handle all the transaction outcomes: >> - manual rollback; >> - error at WAL write; >> - successful WAL write and commit; >> - successful WAL write and wait for synchronization with replicas. > > Looks ok to me. Ack. > > Here is a diff on top of the patch I would add, but up to you, feel free to ignore. Applied and force pushed on the branch.