From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpng1.m.smailru.net (smtpng1.m.smailru.net [94.100.181.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7046746970E for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:51:51 +0300 (MSK) References: <20200123084445.7452-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> From: Leonid Vasiliev Message-ID: <7fcea3b9-2e99-a52f-6997-51be73edec6e@tarantool.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:51:49 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200123084445.7452-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2] refactoring: drop excess 16Kb bss buffer List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sergey Kaplun , tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy On 1/23/20 11:44 AM, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > We already have 12Kb thread-safe static buffer > in `lib/small/small/static.h`, that can be used instead of 16Kb > bss buffer in `src/lib/core/backtrace.cc` for backtrace payload. > > Closes #4650 > --- > > branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/drop-bss-buff > issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4650 > > src/lib/core/backtrace.cc | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/lib/core/backtrace.cc b/src/lib/core/backtrace.cc > index 77f77b05c..c70576b53 100644 > --- a/src/lib/core/backtrace.cc > +++ b/src/lib/core/backtrace.cc > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > > @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ > #include > > #include "small/region.h" > +#include "small/static.h" > /* > * We use a global static buffer because it is too late to do any > * allocation when we are printing backtrace and fiber stack is May be to change the comment or relocate it? > @@ -55,8 +57,6 @@ > > #define BACKTRACE_NAME_MAX 200 > > -static char backtrace_buf[4096 * 4]; > - > static __thread struct region cache_region; > static __thread struct mh_i64ptr_t *proc_cache = NULL; > > @@ -140,8 +140,10 @@ backtrace() > unw_getcontext(&unw_context); > unw_cursor_t unw_cur; > unw_init_local(&unw_cur, &unw_context); > + char *backtrace_buf = (char *)static_alloc(SMALL_STATIC_SIZE); > + assert(backtrace_buf); Do a check on NULL for Release? > char *p = backtrace_buf; > - char *end = p + sizeof(backtrace_buf) - 1; > + char *end = p + SMALL_STATIC_SIZE - 1; > int unw_status; > *p = '\0'; > while ((unw_status = unw_step(&unw_cur)) > 0) { >