From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id DFED22600E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:42:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QMVsXSKTPVzQ for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:42:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp55.i.mail.ru (smtp55.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 9695825CD1 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:42:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/3] txn: merge struct sql_txn into struct txn References: <7d398281ec92e03c1d6f5f1bf93970debcfcc684.1565190104.git.korablev@tarantool.org> <97A342BD-97BD-451F-A54B-A9CF18D352A3@tarantool.org> <3F4125D8-E07C-4FF9-A5D2-550C747BD2B4@tarantool.org> From: Vladislav Shpilevoy Message-ID: <78872b60-229c-1541-50e0-d1b596e61152@tarantool.org> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:45:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3F4125D8-E07C-4FF9-A5D2-550C747BD2B4@tarantool.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: "n.pettik" , tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Kirill Yukhin Thanks for the fixes! LGTM. Kirill, please, proceed. Also take a look at my comment about backport below. On 21/08/2019 02:23, n.pettik wrote: > > >> On 19 Aug 2019, at 23:47, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote: >> >> Hi! Thanks for the fixes! Mine is in a separate commit >> on the branch (after "txn: merge struct sql_txn into struct txn"), >> and below. Please, squash if you are ok with that. > > Yep, thanks, squashed. > >> Talking of savepoint duplicate names - it is a bug existing in 2.2.1 >> too. I think, we should backport the fix. Or not. Up to Kirill. >>