From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 7A43223F13 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:43:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmTn8WLczq2u for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:43:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp56.i.mail.ru (smtp56.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 3AC1B2325F for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:43:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] swim: push-pull dissemination References: <0b77920f623b1ed8beb47112f5607e2f2e74651c.1562278974.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> <20190705082101.GA6177@atlas> From: Vladislav Shpilevoy Message-ID: <6dfa5b87-f8fe-aacd-62ce-a8106de261a6@tarantool.org> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 00:44:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190705082101.GA6177@atlas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: Konstantin Osipov Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Pushed to the master. On 05/07/2019 10:21, Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * Vladislav Shpilevoy [19/07/05 10:17]: >> SWIM in the original paper says, that dissemination time of an >> event is O(log(N)), where N is size of the cluster. It is true, >> when both ping and ack messages carry dissemination and >> anti-entropy. Before this patch it wasn't so - only regular >> pings were carrying something. >> >> After this patch the SWIM module has true exponential >> dissemination speed. >> > > OK to push. > > Now all messages are symmetric, is this right? > > Yes, they all are the same now. Even indirect ones.