On Thursday, June 13, 2019 5:12:56 PM MSK Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 11:44:35PM +0300, Georgy Kirichenko wrote:
> > Don't touch a fiber gc storage on a transaction rollback explicitly.
...
> 
> As I wrote earlier, I'm pretty convinced we don't need to call
> fiber_gc() after txn_commit/rollback at all. Please consider
> removing it in a separate patch.
I call fiber_gc in such cases only in order to preserve the previous behavior. 
I think we could remove fiber_gc when all transaction data would be placed onto 
transaction memory. We could talk about f2f