* [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: fix libfficcall compilation for old GCC
@ 2026-06-08 10:23 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-09 13:55 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2026-06-08 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Bronnikov, Evgeniy Temirgaleev; +Cc: tarantool-patches
On CentOS 7 GCC has no std=c99 by default. This leads to compilation
warnings and errors for ‘for’ loop initial declarations. This patch
fixes that by declaring the variable out of the loop body.
---
Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-tests-old-gcc
CI failure: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/actions/runs/27124968515/job/80063067169#step:6:10593
test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
index 2145b556..129bc75d 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
@@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ int test_2_large_agg_a16(int x, large_agg_a16 s1, large_agg_a16 s2)
const int *v1 = s1.v;
const int *v2 = s2.v;
int sum = x;
- for (int i = 0; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
+ int i = 0;
+ for (; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
sum += v1[i] + v2[i];
}
return sum;
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: fix libfficcall compilation for old GCC
2026-06-08 10:23 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: fix libfficcall compilation for old GCC Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
@ 2026-06-09 13:55 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2026-06-09 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Kaplun, Evgeniy Temirgaleev; +Cc: tarantool-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]
Hello, Sergey,
Thanks for the patch! LGTM with a minor comment.
Sergey
On 6/8/26 13:23, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> On CentOS 7 GCC has no std=c99 by default. This leads to compilation
> warnings and errors for ‘for’ loop initial declarations. This patch
> fixes that by declaring the variable out of the loop body.
> ---
>
> Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-tests-old-gcc
> CI failure:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/actions/runs/27124968515/job/80063067169#step:6:10593
>
> test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
> index 2145b556..129bc75d 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ int test_2_large_agg_a16(int x, large_agg_a16 s1, large_agg_a16 s2)
> const int *v1 = s1.v;
> const int *v2 = s2.v;
> int sum = x;
> - for (int i = 0; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
> + int i = 0;
> + for (; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
isn't better declaring outside the loop and define in a loop?
int i;
for (i = 0; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
It looks more familiar this way. Feel free to ignore.
> sum += v1[i] + v2[i];
> }
> return sum;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2395 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-09 13:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-08 10:23 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: fix libfficcall compilation for old GCC Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-09 13:55 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox