On Friday, May 31, 2019 10:36:10 PM MSK Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * Georgy Kirichenko [19/05/23 11:48]: > > I appreciate you don't use a fiber_call() or fiber_wakeup() > right from the callback, > > In other places we actually use fiber_wakeup(). Please see gc.c, > memtx_engine.c and others. It isn't possible because this fiber could process some yielding activity (ddl). > > So please let's not use has_message/cond, simply wakeup the fiber > in question. > > More comments as to why you need to run these in a fiber would not > harm.