From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [87.239.111.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DB770202; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:14:07 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 dev.tarantool.org C6DB770202 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tarantool.org; s=dev; t=1614168847; bh=9B1t7YnJQm2EnOUNWRd1N1G3hLY0qH4VKFVjbISWEZQ=; h=To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=hjNhUiyZ95hvS9g9viGCesDs/OtWgJL/RzMynKe6qtbCfjjVlCQlp/ugdCr64tJKE xhC8VlMKTbCyJc2deCeDsdz6E9gmFsoni7vOR7Eq3sreuN3oNcYOTgT+2hr9QLqsDw WAVLRSgLpGBqz0YvXFUVxMDXFiMRLe200Jmck4Nw= Received: from smtp49.i.mail.ru (smtp49.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A680D70202 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:14:06 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 dev.tarantool.org A680D70202 Received: by smtp49.i.mail.ru with esmtpa (envelope-from ) id 1lEt3O-0007iA-48; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:14:06 +0300 To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy , tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org References: <20210212112541.27561-1-sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> <57b04874-1bb7-3d62-856d-b60df700514a@tarantool.org> <774363df-6be5-a7b4-ea7f-d72903f3c409@tarantool.org> Message-ID: <40581674-5c4a-e0e3-cc01-b0538ccd36db@tarantool.org> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:14:05 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en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eAau8CL7WIMRKs4sN3D3tLDjz0dLbV79QFUyzQ2Ujvy7cMT6pYYqY16iZVKkSc3dCLJ7zSJH7+u4VD18S7Vl4ZUrpaVfd2+vE6kuoey4m4VkSEu530nj6fImhcD4MUrOEAnl0W826KZ9Q+tr5ycPtXkTV4k65bRjmOUUP8cvGozZ33TWg5HZplvhhXbhDGzqmQDTd6OAevLeAnq3Ra9uf7zvY2zzsIhlcp/Y7m53TZgf2aB4JOg4gkr2biojyK6JYJ15DtLTVqFVLumlmw== X-Mailru-Sender: 3B9A0136629DC9125D61937A2360A4463E4F6F5C3E64E5E88CC354D401FE92A1BD411FAB3972F6B3424AE0EB1F3D1D21E2978F233C3FAE6EE63DB1732555E4A8EE80603BA4A5B0BC112434F685709FCF0DA7A0AF5A3A8387 X-Mras: Ok Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: yield explicitly every N sent rows X-BeenThere: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches Reply-To: Serge Petrenko Errors-To: tarantool-patches-bounces@dev.tarantool.org Sender: "Tarantool-patches" 24.02.2021 15:07, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:35:49PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: >> Thanks for your answer! >> What do you propose? Should I hange it to int64_t then? > Yeah, better to stick with int64_t Ok, no problem. Changed to int64_t. -- Serge Petrenko