Hi! Thanks for the update! That’s exactly was on my mind - an additional job, not changing this one. LGTM. Sergos > On 1 Feb 2023, at 11:52, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > > Hi, Igor! > > Thanks for reply:)! > > On 01.02.23, Igor Munkin wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> On 30.01.23, Sergey Kaplun wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >>>> Shall we add the -DLUAJIT_ENABLE_CHECKHOOK and -DLUAJIT_SMART_STRINGS=1 since they are in Tarantool by default? >>> >>> -DLUAJIT_SMART_STRINGS=1 is set by default, so it's OK not to set it >>> mannually. >>> >>> OTOH, -DLUAJIT_ENABLE_CHECKHOOK is not set by default. >>> I prefer not to set it for this particular workflow, because I plan to >>> use it for very specific builds (even impossible for Tarantool) for >>> example with -DLUAJIT_DISABLE_JIT=ON, -DLUAJIT_DISABLE_FFI=ON flags. >>> Also, this flag is not set for default LuaJIT testing, so I tried to >>> make those workflows look similar. >>> But if we want to add this flag for default build or testing we should >>> add it for this workflow too. >>> CC-ed Igor to hear his opinion. >> >> I'm totally for adding such workflows, but I suggest to do it in a >> separate patch. Sergey, this is on you. > > OK, so I'll add exotic -DLUAJIT_ENBALE_CHECKHOOK job after this patch > will be merged to avoid rebases. > >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Sergey Kaplun >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> IM > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey Kaplun