From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com
 [209.85.167.46])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86CE345C304
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Sun, 20 Dec 2020 21:27:10 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id h205so18403398lfd.5
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 21:27:07 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20201220182707.GE3139@grain>
References: <20201214113935.1040421-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20201214113935.1040421-4-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <2b00fba4-63bd-559f-c273-a02cf3fed6f3@tarantool.org>
 <20201218081416.GG14556@grain>
 <0df4021b-b2b5-0157-e532-0845b0842e92@tarantool.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0df4021b-b2b5-0157-e532-0845b0842e92@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 3/3] test: add
 replication/gh-5446-qsync-eval-quorum.test.lua
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Cc: Mons Anderson <v.perepelitsa@corp.mail.ru>, tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 06:01:02PM +0100, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Thanks for the fixes!
> 
> > Took both notes from some existing example. Would the following be better?
> 
> Yes, thanks, it does not raise any questions now. Although
> you could keep 's' variable to access the space methods shorter.

Will do then, in v5 of series. Thanks a huge for all the feedback, Vlad!