From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (mail-lj1-f179.google.com
 [209.85.208.179])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE53469710
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:47:41 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 11so9743662ljf.2
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:47:37 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20201120114737.GC875895@grain>
References: <20201119194100.840495-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20201119194100.840495-3-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <2cb79b7d-b2f4-fc42-b707-31e109b0ff69@tarantool.org>
 <20201120110148.GA875895@grain>
 <3582e349-1714-294c-968d-7b998cca16fb@tarantool.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <3582e349-1714-294c-968d-7b998cca16fb@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update
	to separate routine
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:39:03PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> > It will say "set ... to n+2/1" while we're printing the evaluated
> > integer value which is more informative.
>=20
> Yes, but when it's actually=A0 configured to number, there'll be duplicate
> messages.
>=20
> You already have the needed log message in the next commit.

+1, thanks!