From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp56.i.mail.ru (smtp56.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0328E469719 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:19:00 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:19:12 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Message-ID: <20200929051912.muudnazav6jgl3nu@tkn_work_nb> References: <7eaf13e0ac86f3c9afe521d82d2dc907479b3ffe.1600955781.git.tsafin@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X 7/7] module api: luaL_cdata_iscallable List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladislav Shpilevoy Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org > 2. luaL_iscallable() already checks luaL_cdata_iscallable(). Why > do you need it separated from luaL_iscallable()? +1 here. The same question from my side.