From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp56.i.mail.ru (smtp56.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC20469719 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:26:30 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:26:29 +0300 From: Kirill Yukhin Message-ID: <20200918122629.ucdpf7xabskxm6k6@tarantool.org> References: <20200917135121.60380-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200917135121.60380-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/3] lua/pwd: workaround the systemd bug List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: tml , Alexander Turenko Hello, On 17 сен 16:51, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Guys, take a look please once time permit. The first two patches > are optional but I think while we're at this code and we could > improve the code base we should. > > Also I've been thinking on how to test the issue -- we need a buggy > systemd instance running and we actually have Fedora 29 on gitlab > where tests are passed but it is unclear for me how exactly we could > use it. Initially I thought of injecting some error code into pwd module > itself but then I left this idea of making code more ugly just because > of some bug in the particular systemd version. > > So my criteria was that the change must not break anything in existing > tests but if you have some idea for testing, please share. > > issue https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5034 > branch gorcunov/gh-5034-passwd LGTM. I've checked your patch into 1.10, 2.4, 2.5 and master. Could you please update release notes since I see no entry in cover letter. -- Regards, Kirill Yukhin