From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp33.i.mail.ru (smtp33.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7C9445320 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:04:58 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:04:57 +0000 From: Nikita Pettik Message-ID: <20200715160457.GD26087@tarantool.org> References: <1594821336-14468-1-git-send-email-alyapunov@tarantool.org> <1594821336-14468-4-git-send-email-alyapunov@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1594821336-14468-4-git-send-email-alyapunov@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 03/13] vinyl: rename tx_manager -> vy_tx_manager List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aleksandr Lyapunov Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org On 15 Jul 16:55, Aleksandr Lyapunov wrote: > Apart from other vinyl objects that are named with "vy_" prefix, > its transaction manager (tx_manager) have no such prefix. > It should have in order to avoid conflicts with global tx manager. > > Needed for #4897 > --- LGTM. The only concern I have now - mb we'd better call new TX manager in memtx not tx_manager, but mem_tx_manager or memtx_tx_manager? I mean tx_ prefix is more general than memtx_..