From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A259D445320 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:07:13 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id r19so7924897ljn.12 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:07:10 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Message-ID: <20200710210710.GH1999@grain> References: <20200710075605.217824-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> <20200710075605.217824-3-gorcunov@gmail.com> <5040e7f2-6222-98d2-f058-4b2e903e758d@tarantool.org> <72595d93-b6d2-d97d-4270-e3d3e51a1275@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <72595d93-b6d2-d97d-4270-e3d3e51a1275@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/5] qsync: add a comment about sync txn in journal allocation List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladislav Shpilevoy Cc: tml On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:34:27PM +0200, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote: > Не, сори, все ок. Коммент норм. Я уже не соображаю. Но > замечание про свормы мелких изменений все еще справедливо. The main reason for small changes is for easier merging, iirc you were fixing some code and I didn't want to tie-up with the changes, making potential merge conflict easier to resolve.