From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com (mail-lj1-f194.google.com
 [209.85.208.194])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6946445320
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Mon,  6 Jul 2020 00:37:26 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id t25so38483941lji.12
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Sun, 05 Jul 2020 14:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 00:37:22 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200705213722.GL2256@grain>
References: <20200703144526.522358-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <a8de4426-aafd-0dea-4f35-549650e9fd22@tarantool.org>
 <20200704073038.GK2256@grain>
 <0d0901d65311$f8c7a030$ea56e090$@tarantool.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0d0901d65311$f8c7a030$ea56e090$@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/22] Use void type in empty
 arguments list
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Timur Safin <tsafin@tarantool.org>
Cc: 'tml' <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, 'Vladislav Shpilevoy' <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>, 'Alexander Turenko' <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 12:19:30AM +0300, Timur Safin wrote:
> : 
> : >
> : > Talking of the patch - why did you change .cc files? AFAIK, in C++
> : > (void) and () are the same. Just no arguments.
> : 
> : True, still we've a mess between () and (void) in cc files, so
> : I unified the approach.
> 
> FWIW it's considered bad style to use (void) in C++ instead of ()
> 
> https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#nl25-dont-use-void-as-an-argument-type
> 

IIRC we've been planning to switch to C eventually.