From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp41.i.mail.ru (smtp41.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946C342EF5C for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 16:51:58 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 16:51:06 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Message-ID: <20200626135106.4o7mraweajyd4izo@tkn_work_nb> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/7] build: static build needs more cleanup in sources List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Alexander V. Tikhonov" Cc: Oleg Piskunov , tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org > diff --git a/Dockerfile.staticbuild b/Dockerfile.staticbuild > index 253f2d5e9..f67f46f5e 100644 > --- a/Dockerfile.staticbuild > +++ b/Dockerfile.staticbuild > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ RUN set -x && \ > RUN set -x && \ > find . -name 'CMakeFiles' -type d -exec rm -rf {} + && \ > find . -name 'CMakeCache.txt' -type f -delete && \ > - rm -rf build > + rm -rf build test/small test/luajit-tap What if I'll push a short-term branch that adds one more test directory? I think that the directory should be cleaned up entirely (git clean for sources and submodules). And it seems that it is done with [1], right? Such spotted cleanup will insuperably fails in some cases. Anyway, I don't have objections against this certain patch if it still needed after [1], just noted that it necessary only because the overall approach is not good. [1]: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5036 WBR, Alexander Turenko.