From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com (mail-lj1-f193.google.com [209.85.208.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5D6469710 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 01:52:17 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z9so9339893ljh.13 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 01:52:15 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Message-ID: <20200604225215.GB146885@atlas> References: <7407b62139349ee3904a674490a6222b0c960a1c.1591292549.git.korablev@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7407b62139349ee3904a674490a6222b0c960a1c.1591292549.git.korablev@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] vinyl: rotate mem during index build on demand List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nikita Pettik Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org * Nikita Pettik [20/06/04 20:49]: > So to get rid of generations mismatch, let's rotate in-memory level > after yield on demand. Could you please also elaborate why generation mismatch is bad here? What does it lead to specifically? -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia