From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp48.i.mail.ru (smtp48.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF53469710 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:29:48 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:29:32 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Message-ID: <20200603122932.qxwmu65xmkvcovcv@tkn_work_nb> References: <863e5ca812384f62cc573f96b1b314fe87a0b86d.1589999586.git.avtikhon@tarantool.org> <20200601123950.fj2c3tjza7hbksf6@tkn_work_nb> <20200602175642.GA4599@hpalx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200602175642.GA4599@hpalx> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1] Set full testing for all branches List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Alexander V. Tikhonov" Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org I have no more objections. If everything works as expected and we're ready to such amount of jobs, the change will allow to catch some problems before a patch will land into master. BTW, please add 'gitlab-ci' prefix. > > > .pack_only_template: &pack_only_definition > > > only: > > > - schedules > > > - external_pull_requests > > > - merge_requests > > > - - /^.*-full-ci$/ > > > + - branches > > > + - tags > > > > First, there is not reason to list 'schedules', 'external_pull_requests' > > and so if you want to just run it everywhere. > > > > Actually I just wanted to make it more visible for the users, but anyway > if it not really needed I'll change it to "except: master". > > > Second, we should not run both 'just packaging' and 'packaging and > > deployment' jobs on master. I would make ''pack_only_template' be just > > 'except: master'. Yep, it is not perfect: 'schedules', > > 'external_pull_requests' will don't run neither 'pack', nor 'deploy'. > > But this change is simple and downsides are acceptable. > > > > Right, it is the same as previous my comment. I would mention the known downside somewhere, preferably just in this config.