From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com (mail-lf1-f65.google.com [209.85.167.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 208B0469710 for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 22:30:34 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j14so7883369lfg.9 for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 12:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 22:30:32 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Message-ID: <20200503193032.GB6400@atlas> References: <20200503104629.GD23133@atlas> <557cd907-10fb-a98b-d048-506a40b91357@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <557cd907-10fb-a98b-d048-506a40b91357@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/1] wal: simplify rollback List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladislav Shpilevoy Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org * Vladislav Shpilevoy [20/05/03 22:26]: > This is actually funny - you don't like that we make 'our own design'? > You would rather expect us make all design decisions only if they are > authored and approved by you? Well, then you should just have stayed in > the team. Or send your own patches, or at least your own RFCs. So far you > only complain. You don't propose anything. I love your own design. Vshard has a lot of decisions I had no clue about and I love them. I hate it when you make up something ugly *only* because you want to have it quick. This is the case with not using in-memory WAL. I will take a look at the branch and provide comments, and respond to the rest later. > You can't really expect us to wait for your approval on everything we > do, including a simple refactoring patch. I don't. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia https://scylladb.com