From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com (mail-lf1-f65.google.com
 [209.85.167.65])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2EB14696C3
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:10:24 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r17so968230lff.2
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:10:21 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200417071021.GV3072@uranus>
References: <20200416120658.33777-1-sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
 <20200416123802.GS3072@uranus> <20200416124240.GT3072@uranus>
 <20200417070227.kjdavtfhyaykfevf@tarantool.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200417070227.kjdavtfhyaykfevf@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: move
 relay_schedule_pending_gc before status
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:02:27AM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > > 
> > > Maybe it worth to have two commits?
> > > 
> > >  - use vclock_compare_ignore0 in relay_schedule_pending_gc
> > >  - reorder relay_schedule_pending_gc
> > 
> > Doesn't matter, already merged :)
> 
> I have no idea, why my mail wasn't sent.
> 
> Anyway, the patch was committed to master.

No, I've been replying and then found that you've
already merged the patch. IOW you msg been delivered
properly. That's why I said "already merged".