From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp14.mail.ru (smtp14.mail.ru [94.100.181.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B92E4696C3 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:02:28 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:02:27 +0300 From: Kirill Yukhin Message-ID: <20200417070227.kjdavtfhyaykfevf@tarantool.org> References: <20200416120658.33777-1-sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> <20200416123802.GS3072@uranus> <20200416124240.GT3072@uranus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200416124240.GT3072@uranus> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: move relay_schedule_pending_gc before status List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org Hello, On 16 апр 15:42, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 03:38:02PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > ... > > > This code was present in v5 of the patchset regarding local space replication > > > rework, but I accidentally threw it away during the review. Sorry. > > > The letter was "[PATCH v5 2/4] replication: hide 0-th vclock components in > > > replication responses" > > > > > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/sp/relay-gc-fix > > > > Maybe it worth to have two commits? > > > > - use vclock_compare_ignore0 in relay_schedule_pending_gc > > - reorder relay_schedule_pending_gc > > Doesn't matter, already merged :) I have no idea, why my mail wasn't sent. Anyway, the patch was committed to master. -- Regards, Kirill Yukhin