From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com (mail-lf1-f67.google.com [209.85.167.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA03F4696C3 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:44:19 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f8so1813907lfe.12 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:44:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:44:17 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Message-ID: <20200415074417.GM3072@uranus> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 13/13] popen: add caution comment for popen_may_io() List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Turenko Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:25:50AM +0300, Alexander Turenko wrote: > It was easy to misinterpret popen_may_io() contract. In fact, I made > this mistake recently and want to clarify how the function should be > called. > > Part of #4031 Ack