From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <korablev@tarantool.org>
Received: from smtp60.i.mail.ru (smtp60.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.40])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B89F4696C3
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri,  3 Apr 2020 16:00:01 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:00:00 +0000
From: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>
Message-ID: <20200403130000.GB2993@tarantool.org>
References: <91166652f0b9cd151ca485538e6e895639c62acd.1585823952.git.imeevma@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <91166652f0b9cd151ca485538e6e895639c62acd.1585823952.git.imeevma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 1/1] sql: specify field types in
 ephemeral space format
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: imeevma@tarantool.org
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org

On 02 Apr 13:41, imeevma@tarantool.org wrote:
> This patch allows to specify field types in ephemeral space format.
> Prior to this patch, all fields had a SCALAR field type.
> Closes #3841
> ---
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3841
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/imeevma/gh-3841-format-for-ephemeral-space
> 
> @ChangeLog
>  - Format of ephemeral spaces can have field with types other that
>    SCALAR now (gh-3841).
> 

This change is not visible to users. Should we extend changelog
with corresponding entry?