From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp50.i.mail.ru (smtp50.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C821441841 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:54:21 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:54:19 +0300 From: Kirill Yukhin Message-ID: <20200326125419.os5yywcjxylpncdc@tarantool.org> References: <7982fc7b062b2424689a990de1f76ca2ff0e4f50.1585053743.git.lvasiliev@tarantool.org> <20200324200216.GA18984@atlas> <178dd6a0-cdee-532c-3d0a-af76062d5f6c@tarantool.org> <20200325084205.GG18984@atlas> <09a887d4-7459-683b-8a10-c3a0d27bc8c3@tarantool.org> <20200326121653.GA6796@atlas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200326121653.GA6796@atlas> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/6] iproto: Add negotiation phase List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Konstantin Osipov , lvasiliev , alexander.turenko@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Hello, On 26 мар 15:16, Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * lvasiliev [20/03/26 14:18]: > > In this case, the answer must be changed from ok/fail to the answer with > > payload. > > In my opinion the negotiation looks as: > > - the client offers options for the session > > - the server sends the resulting response with options (which may differ > > from the requested) > > - the client decides to work with such settings or disconnect > > I think that negotiation phase can be used for flexible session setup in the > > future (not only for errors) > > Cost of establishing a connection should be as low as possible. > A sharded tarantool cluster has n^2 of them, and n can be very big > - each cpu core is its own instance. 400 000 connections per > cluster are not uncommon. I think this is pretty much fable. -- Regards, Kirill Yukhin