From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com (mail-lj1-f180.google.com [209.85.208.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8372469719 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:10:45 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id a2so3010336ljk.6 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:10:44 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Message-ID: <20200318201044.GC17681@atlas> References: <51d5cb03a56b7e99481d9ab62cb90ba072a83dc3.1584558067.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51d5cb03a56b7e99481d9ab62cb90ba072a83dc3.1584558067.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/5] vclock: add an ability to set individual clock components List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Serge Petrenko Cc: v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org * Serge Petrenko [20/03/18 22:52]: > This is needed to 'hide' 0-th vclock component in replication responses. How are these patches connected? If they are not connected, why are in the same series as matrix clock? -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia https://scylladb.com