From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com (mail-lj1-f193.google.com
 [209.85.208.193])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DE2469719
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:40:32 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id s13so5931667ljm.1
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:40:30 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200310174030.GG27301@uranus>
References: <20200302201227.31785-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20200302201227.31785-7-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20200303113853.2gmoaph7zet7rzwo@tkn_work_nb>
 <20200303114537.GF22649@uranus>
 <20200310154949.5zdpc4pcpc7evczz@tkn_work_nb>
 <20200310163646.3yngdlq6wzutzmri@tkn_work_nb>
 <20200310164100.GF27301@uranus>
 <20200310171252.nxim2zgghvdqkmei@tkn_work_nb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200310171252.nxim2zgghvdqkmei@tkn_work_nb>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/7] popen: handle setsid os
	specifics
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:12:52PM +0300, Alexander Turenko wrote:
> 
> After looking around discussions re other popen implementations, I guess
> that we'll be asked for those abilities sooner or later. It seems
> logical to implement it, since we know it is expected from a popen
> implementation.

OK, convinced. Will do.