From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com (mail-lf1-f65.google.com [209.85.167.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AC2469719 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:40:10 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id z5so2451131lfd.12 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:40:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:40:08 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Message-ID: <20200226164008.GA29715@atlas> References: <1582716061.103393657@f179.i.mail.ru> <20200226115815.GE15433@atlas> <1582732697.613312845@f380.i.mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1582732697.613312845@f380.i.mail.ru> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 4/4] replication: do not relay rows coming from a remote instance back to it List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Serge Petrenko Cc: kirichenkoga@gmail.com, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org * Serge Petrenko [20/02/26 19:01]: OK, you decided to skip it altogether, that is not very realistic though. Let's see whether anyone else will like this test case (I'm not very fond of it). What was wrong with adding fiber_sleep()? -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia