From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp34.i.mail.ru (smtp34.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A04746970E for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 14:35:26 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 14:35:25 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Message-ID: <20191228113525.k33zog4b3hd67sde@tkn_work_nb> References: <002eae0ce1f0c7f28b5ef43236e069172942fdae.1577455413.git.imeevma@gmail.com> <20191227215518.GM18639@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191227215518.GM18639@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 1/3] box: introduce 'virtual' engine List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nikita Pettik Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org > As an alternative to 'virtual' name I can suggest 'service', 'system' > (not so good since we already have 'sysview'), 'sysspace' (similar to > 'sysview'). More comes into my mind: 'interface', 'assessor', 'computational', 'evaluable', 'trackdown', 'derived', 'passthrough', 'gateway'. 'gateway' looks better then all others for me. WBR, Alexander Turenko.