From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com (mail-lf1-f67.google.com
 [209.85.167.67])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E9246970E
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Thu, 26 Dec 2019 10:19:24 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n25so17971946lfl.0
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 23:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 10:19:21 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20191226071921.GD2463@uranus>
References: <20191217125420.20881-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20191217125420.20881-3-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20191226071441.GB6901@atlas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191226071441.GB6901@atlas>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 2/4] popen: Introduce a backend
	engine
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:14:41AM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
...
> > +	say_debug("popen: %d: read idx [%s:%d] buf %p count %zu "
> > +		  "fds %d timeout %.9g",
> > +		  handle->pid, stdX_str(idx), idx, buf, count,
> > +		  handle->fds[idx], timeout);
> > +
> > +	return coio_read_fd_timeout(handle->fds[idx],
> > +				    buf, count, timeout);
> > +}
> 
> Right, so could you please use struct coio here, and not
> coio_read_fd_timeout? I.e. convert handle->fds to coio?

I'll try. Thanks Kostya!