From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com (mail-lj1-f194.google.com
 [209.85.208.194])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BEA46970F
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:31:33 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id d5so26233149ljl.4
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:31:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:31:31 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20191127223131.GG2472@uranus>
References: <20191126151557.25754-1-sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
 <20191126205620.GC23422@atlas> <20191127160751.GF2472@uranus>
 <20191127215147.GB31812@atlas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191127215147.GB31812@atlas>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] clear terminal state on panic
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:51:47AM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> > 
> > Should not we rather provide some tarantool_atexit() helper
> > from where we would call other cleanup and etc routines?
> > We already have tarantool_atfork() hook. Not a big deal
> > but while the code in question is being modified anyway.
> 
> Why not, still the exit procedure is complicated because of
> on_shutdown triggers, so it's important that if there are changes
> to it, they are documented in the code, not in cs comments.

Yes, putting comment into the code why we're to restore the
terminal settings on panic is quite important.