From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpng3.m.smailru.net (smtpng3.m.smailru.net [94.100.177.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A644B46970F for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:34:23 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:32:16 +0300 From: Igor Munkin Message-ID: <20191126213216.GC16745@tarantool.org> References: <20191126165407.ncmd7hepnpifgv6v@tkn_work_nb> <20191126205800.GD23422@atlas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191126205800.GD23422@atlas> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] test: adjust the test name related to PAIRSMM flag List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Konstantin Osipov Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Kostja, Thanks for your remark. I've seen no mention related to the test naming in our contribution guide[1]. However, your point is valid: *all* other chunks uses underscores, but not dashes, and the name used in this patch differs from already existing ones. Besides, there is another convention mentioned by Vlad and successfully missed by me sometime. I see the most convenient solution is adjusting the related test name to a common style and further naming refactoring within some follow-up activity. On 26.11.19, Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * Alexander Turenko [19/11/26 19:57]: > > > rename from test/mmpairs_test.lua > > > rename to test/mmpairs-tarantool-4560.test.lua > > *All* of the source code uses underscores, not dashes for file > names. > > > -- > Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia [1]: https://www.tarantool.io/en/doc/2.2/dev_guide/lua_style_guide/#testing -- Best regards, IM