From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com (mail-pf1-f195.google.com [209.85.210.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28603452566 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:26:18 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id n13so999006pff.1 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 09:26:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:26:14 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Message-ID: <20191104172614.GE29784@atlas> References: <2634a4d09a1fa18147e8837e2738870faa8fd247.1572565151.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2634a4d09a1fa18147e8837e2738870faa8fd247.1572565151.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] tuple: move tuple_update into xrow_update/ folder List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladislav Shpilevoy Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org * Vladislav Shpilevoy [19/11/01 09:55]: > Tuple_update.c already uses xrow_update_ namespace. Soon it will > have more files extending this namespace. In order to keep them > isolated they are moved to a new subfolder box/xrow_update/. > > Part of #1261 I wonder if we still need this patch. Now that everything is prefixed, why not keep it in box? This is not a standalone library anyway, so I would not create a sub-folder for it. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia