From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com (mail-lj1-f195.google.com
 [209.85.208.195])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB4D4429A8
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:15:57 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id a21so2042230ljh.9
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:15:54 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20191025101554.GG2511@uranus.lan>
References: <20191004074926.17329-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20191004074926.17329-4-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <20191025000022.msnkmuyh3mydxxim@tkn_work_nb>
 <20191025074012.GC2511@uranus.lan>
 <20191025095311.onkz36woc2bbzc5u@tkn_work_nb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191025095311.onkz36woc2bbzc5u@tkn_work_nb>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/7] box/console: Add explicit
	output EOS mapping
List-Id: Tarantool development <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@freelists.org>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:53:12PM +0300, Alexander Turenko wrote:
> 
> There are some flaws however:
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4082
> 
> I suspect the latter approach is not usable for cases where we have no
> Lua interpreter on a client side (say, for test-run); I mentioned it to
> provide more broad information.

Thanks a huge! Will read.