From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id ECA9D26786 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:49:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Er78jyqbBN-L for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:49:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp38.i.mail.ru (smtp38.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id ABD4926762 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:49:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:49:18 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce WITH ENGINE option for CREATE TABLE stmt Message-ID: <20190820134918.GB12831@atlas> References: <20190820115755.GF8932@atlas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: "n.pettik" Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org * n.pettik [19/08/20 15:15]: > > > > On 20 Aug 2019, at 14:57, Konstantin Osipov wrote: > > > > * Nikita Pettik [19/08/19 17:54]: > >> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4422 > >> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/np/gh-4422-with-engine-option > >> > > > > I am utterly disappointed with the fact that instead of fixing a > > broken feature that is already there and have been waiting years > > for a fix > > What feature exactly are you talking about? The one we discussed and agreed on, set engine='vinyl' > > you spend time on working on a new feature > > It was done in one day, not so much time spent I guess. > > > which *no one* except your highly aesthetic self has asked for :( > > Every week I see questions in public chat like “how to create vinyl table > using SQL facilities” and that’s a fact. The answer should be: use set engine='vinyl'. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia