From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 28C7526FB6 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H0WlfqPyrBOO for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp39.i.mail.ru (smtp39.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id DE84626FAF for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:47:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:47:09 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/7] Replication: In-memory replication Message-ID: <20190816134709.GA18643@atlas> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: Georgy Kirichenko * Georgy Kirichenko [19/08/13 10:30]: Georgy, Could you please benchmark this? Does latency improve? How does this patch change CPU utilization with intensive replication, 1, 2, 3 replicas? Results could be quite good (I hope). -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia