From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:12:23 +0300 From: Vladimir Davydov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] lua/pickle: fix a typo Message-ID: <20190814111223.GE13834@esperanza> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: Serge Petrenko Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, kostja@tarantool.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 02:55:54PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: > --- > src/lua/pickle.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/lua/pickle.c b/src/lua/pickle.c > index e47ac11b4..65208b5b3 100644 > --- a/src/lua/pickle.c > +++ b/src/lua/pickle.c > @@ -109,14 +109,14 @@ lbox_pack(struct lua_State *L) > case 'I': > case 'i': > /* signed and unsigned 32-bit integers */ > - if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.ival != MP_INT) > + if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.type != MP_INT) > luaL_error(L, "pickle.pack: expected 32-bit int"); > > luaL_region_dup(L, buf, &field.ival, sizeof(uint32_t)); > break; > case 'N': > /* signed and unsigned 32-bit big endian integers */ > - if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.ival != MP_INT) > + if (field.type != MP_UINT && field.type != MP_INT) > luaL_error(L, "pickle.pack: expected 32-bit int"); > > field.ival = htonl(field.ival); I assume this is a bug and so this patch should be pushed to all maintained branches, right? Could you please add a test for this issue?