From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kostja@tarantool.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:14:47 +0300
From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 3/3] alter: fix rollback in case
 DDL and DML are used in the same transaction
Message-ID: <20190730121447.GG21469@atlas>
References: <cover.1563895921.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
 <fdf4da12920e71ad11a05cf9d1641b76b6d77e76.1563895921.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
 <20190724223255.GC13150@atlas>
 <20190725085117.GF24631@esperanza>
 <20190730105659.GI4659@esperanza>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190730105659.GI4659@esperanza>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
List-ID: <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>

* Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [19/07/30 15:04]:
> An alternative approach to this issue is attaching DDL triggers to txn
> statements and running rollback triggers "synchronously" while rolling
> back statements. This would allow us not to impose any strict
> requirements on how DDL triggers are implemented.

I like it!

-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia