From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:59:01 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Allow to execute non-yielding DDL statements in transactions Message-ID: <20190708215901.GE7873@atlas> References: <2f4db121e3afe9599172b9a3abf8a48ab47e524b.1562357452.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> <20190705225635.GB30966@atlas> <20190708080934.hp3zgk6ppw5mu2ww@esperanza> <20190708082116.GB21719@atlas> <20190708084330.dkh5zj4v67unt46o@esperanza> <20190708092506.GA8512@atlas> <20190708164648.mug6rrfesclasdqv@esperanza> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190708164648.mug6rrfesclasdqv@esperanza> To: Vladimir Davydov Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-ID: * Vladimir Davydov [19/07/08 22:14]: > The problem is such a test is really difficult to come up with, because > we'd have to implement something like a dependency graph describing > which operations can be run after which. IMHO it isn't worth doing just > for the sake of a functional test. I volunteer to help :), and it is very much worth doing according to my experience. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia