From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:25:06 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Allow to execute non-yielding DDL statements in transactions Message-ID: <20190708092506.GA8512@atlas> References: <2f4db121e3afe9599172b9a3abf8a48ab47e524b.1562357452.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> <20190705225635.GB30966@atlas> <20190708080934.hp3zgk6ppw5mu2ww@esperanza> <20190708082116.GB21719@atlas> <20190708084330.dkh5zj4v67unt46o@esperanza> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190708084330.dkh5zj4v67unt46o@esperanza> To: Vladimir Davydov Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-ID: * Vladimir Davydov [19/07/08 11:45]: > > In any case you test a fixed number of combinations, and should > > come up with a randomized test. This feature encompasses all DDL > > operators, including: > > > > - roles > > - users > > - functions > > - SQL triggers > > - SQL foreign key constraints > > - SQL views > > - SQL check constraints > > > > Every object should be involved in the test, and the generated > > transactions should be random. > > Sounds tricky :-/ May be, hand this over to Q&A? Nobody is going to write the test better than you. You may even hand this over to mermaids or some other mythical creature, if you don't want this to happen. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia