From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:58:05 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 04/10] vinyl: rework vylog
 transaction backlog implementation
Message-ID: <20190606115805.hzwa627beconnqko@esperanza>
References: <cover.1558103547.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
 <8f65d06127e605e1ab41a24f984fec816c2d23cc.1558103547.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
 <20190601083838.GE29429@atlas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190601083838.GE29429@atlas>
To: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
List-ID: <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>

On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:38:38AM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> * Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [19/05/17 17:54]:
> 
> I like this approach, I would push it regardless of other patches.
> The patch is LGTM.

I'm afraid I can't push it without the previous patch. You see, I need
to flush the xlog buffer before loading vylog. I can't call xlog_flush
from vy_recovery_new unless it's running in the same thread as vylog
writer, because xlog struct shouldn't be used from different threads.
But without the previous patch vy_recovery_new runs in coio, not WAL.