From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 5AB7B2BCC5 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 03:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YqBfp4lsX6IV for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 03:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpng2.m.smailru.net (smtpng2.m.smailru.net [94.100.179.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 98FDF2BC63 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 03:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 10:12:58 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/2] luajit2: bugfix: fixed a segfault when unsinking 64-bit pointers Message-ID: <20190527071256.543y6thlccivknir@tkn_work_nb> References: <20190523174634.32314-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190523174634.32314-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: tml , Kirill Yukhin LGTM. Kirill, please proceed. I think we should push this fix for all currently supported branches. Please, close issue https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4072 from the commit message in a commit for tarantool repo. WBR, Alexader Turenko. On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 08:46:32PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > The series fixes segfault when unsinking 64-bit pointers. > Note that I've backported a patch and a test for us but > the problem didn't trigger for me even when luajit2 is > unpatched. > > That said up to you, still think it might be usefull for > case #4171 This issue is reproduced on Linux, where we don't use GC64, so it is not related.