From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 81C772E05B for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:44:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jc_nigtkt5TG for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:44:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp51.i.mail.ru (smtp51.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id E086B2E025 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 14:44:29 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/core: introduce decimal type to tarantool Message-ID: <20190523114429.GA13794@atlas> References: <20190521145920.GB15755@atlas> <1731779.4I93YYQjSG@home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1731779.4I93YYQjSG@home.lan> Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: =?utf-8?B?0JPQtdC+0YDQs9C40Lkg0JrQuNGA0LjRh9C10L3QutC+?= Cc: Serge Petrenko , tarantool-patches@freelists.org * Георгий Кириченко [19/05/23 11:47]: > > > > How does this co-exist with the bindings for the same library > > > > made by the community? > > > > > > What do you mean? I’m not sure I understand. > > > Are you talking about conversions between our decimal and ldecnumber > > > decimal? > > I mean the symbol clash when people are trying to use the > > standalone .so > I'm not sure there is a symbol clash because Serge used a static library and > non-marked symbols are stripped. If would use a shared one then users code > won't do anything and reuse the linked library. this would be nice, could you test this is the case indeed? -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia