From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 01AE62E5EA for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 06:37:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6t1l3hZpwFI for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 06:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 8A7872E51E for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 06:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id a10so4981133ljf.6 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:37:18 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] luajit: Bacport patches from openrusty Message-ID: <20190523103718.GD11013@uranus> References: <20190522190510.17201-1-gorcunov@gmail.com> <20190523103253.psjfj6btjqiihg3p@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190523103253.psjfj6btjqiihg3p@tarantool.org> Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: Kirill Yukhin Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Alexander Turenko On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:32:53PM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote: > Hello, > > On 22 May 22:05, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > This series should help us with https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4171 > > > > Note the first three patches are for our luajit submodule, the last > > one is for tarantool to test the changes. > > > > Part-of #4171 > > I've checked the patchset into 1.10, 2.1 and master branches. Thanks! Lets wait it to pass all travis tests. Please ping me if something goes wrong. You know I've noticed that openrusy has another bug fix for that named unsink 64bit pointers, I backported it too but didn't reveal any difference when was running tests, so I desided to not include it for a while.