From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 001C52ED84 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 12:02:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XY6ys-yBGt3 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 12:02:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp33.i.mail.ru (smtp33.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id B17432DCF4 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 12:02:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by smtp33.i.mail.ru with esmtpa (envelope-from ) id 1hT7Dq-0008Ti-0z for tarantool-patches@freelists.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 19:02:38 +0300 Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 19:02:35 +0300 From: Kirill Yukhin Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/4] A few fixes/improvements for autoincrement indexes Message-ID: <20190521160235.mpfphhtlopijbqoj@tarantool.org> References: <20190521104229.ciqddxid4ppfpszl@tarantool.org> <20190521145837.GA15755@atlas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190521145837.GA15755@atlas> Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-post: List-Archive: To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Hello, On 21 май 17:58, Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * Kirill Yukhin [19/05/21 13:43]: > > Hello, > > > > schema: explicitly forbid setting sequence for json path key part > > I asked to use an existing option and allow field names in the > patch, e.g. sequece = path.to.field. Do you suggest to allow assigning a sequence to JSON path? > I don't see that this is done in the patch. > > Why did you check it in? Vova replied you here [1], this might be useful follow-up, but right now looks like this is out of scope of the request. They just need to be able to set sequence to an arbitrary index part. Since five days pass w/o answer I've checked it into master. [1] - https://www.freelists.org/post/tarantool-patches/PATCH-34-schema-allow-to-set-sequence-for-any-index-part-not-just-the-first,2 -- Regards, Kirill Yukhin