From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
Return-Path: <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:42:41 +0300
From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] Add merger for tuples
 streams (C part)
Message-ID: <20190425164241.GB7320@atlas>
References: <cover.1554906327.git.alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
 <963ad528ad35199943931150956c1d5e2c374c40.1554906327.git.alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
 <20190425114343.GM29257@atlas>
 <20190425133227.mvell3bwcbhzqkyb@tkn_work_nb>
 <20190425134539.GA10572@atlas>
 <20190425153210.kbwzjlq3fdjwogcn@tkn_work_nb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190425153210.kbwzjlq3fdjwogcn@tkn_work_nb>
To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
List-ID: <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>

* Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> [19/04/25 18:36]:
> Anyway, I see the word 'input' is quite often in map-reduce libraries
> documentation. Should we use it instead of 'source'? merge_input or
> merger_input?

The problem is not with the word "source", it's with the word
"merger".


-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov